October 20th, 2010
This section is designed to explore the concept of defining requirements, from a business perspective, that can be used to inform system developers or implementers on what is needed to achieve business goals.
This is all very well but how do you know you need to change something?
The first step in any system specification is to accept that you need something. Part of the process of defining what you need is deciding why you need it and what other purposes you would fulfill if this requirement was met.
In many cases business changes things for the sake on change – the old adage “new broom sweeps clean” is the worst case of this – every time someone new comes into the organisation they want to change things to something they know or have experience with. Unless a decent business case can be presented for changing things or adding new things, you must resist the temptation of changing things for changes sake.
Once you understand the reason for change you need to specify the requirements of your new system. It is completely useless trying to compare multiple products against each other becasue all you will end up with is the best product that you can afford – without any bearing on what you actually need. Rememebr tht once you buy a product or system for you organisation you are stuck with it for many years – if it does not realise benefits for you from day 1 – then why are you changing?
You system requirements must come from the people within the business. don;t be tempted to find a consultant to define your requirements. Consultants are great for helping you surface requirements, sort or order them and research the ramifications of the requirements but they do not understand your business like the people who work for you. Make sure that you surface the correct requirements for the correct reasons or you will have a new system that only partially fulfills your business requirements.
October 1st, 2010
When we view an organisation as a system for sense-making, we can see how power is can be used not only as a tool to get things done in a particular way, but also as a tool that affects the sense-making process of the rest of the organisation. Brown says “power is most strategically . . . → Read More: Making Sense At Work
September 27th, 2010
With King III being a much talked about governance requirement for JSE listed companies I thought I’d look at the Information Technology implications of King III – specifically how it affects the CIO. Bear in mind that King III is about ‘adopt or explain’ rather than ‘comply or else!’
King III, in Chapter 5, states “The board . . . → Read More: King III and the CIO
September 15th, 2010
Does a senior management team command the power to reject the collective intelligence of the organisation below it? The answer may lie equally in the beliefs of the employees as in the practices of the management team. Metcalf and Urwick talk of the reaction to power as a “natural urge” to regain an equilibrium . . . → Read More: Power in Business
September 9th, 2010
When we look at an organisation from a perspective of language, metaphor and representation, as suggested by Julian Day and Mike Jackson, we discover that the language spoken by many of the top management teams in organisations today, supports the view of being leaders in control of an organisation.
Interestingly, other groups within the same . . . → Read More: How Does Language Affect Your Organisation?
August 27th, 2010
When we have done research into leadership styles we have often detected a dismissive attitude towards the employees by a management team. The management team have an opinion that they know what is right for the organisation and that they, exclusively, must lead this organisation. Whilst this is not a bad thing, Peter Senge . . . → Read More: Business Leadership Effectiveness